Louisiana House Bill HCR32

Louisiana 2010 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/29/10
• Refer: 3/30/10

Caption

Memorializes congress to make no law that does not apply equally to members of congress and other U.S. citizens

Impact

The adoption of HCR32, while a memorial rather than a binding law, conveys a strong message about governmental accountability and the importance of equal treatment under the law. It seeks to influence how future legislation is crafted and perceived, particularly regarding the perceived privileges that members of Congress may enjoy. This resolution could create a dialogue on legislative reforms aimed at enhancing citizens' trust in governmental operations and ensuring fair legal treatment for everyone, regardless of status.

Summary

HCR32, introduced by Representative Pope, is a concurrent resolution that memorializes the United States Congress to ensure that no law is enacted that does not apply equally to both members of Congress and all U.S. citizens. The resolution emphasizes the principle of equality under the law, as originally articulated in the Declaration of Independence. This legislative effort is aimed at calling attention to perceived disparities in how laws affect Congress members compared to ordinary citizens, reinforcing the idea that all individuals should be subject to the same legal standards and obligations.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment surrounding HCR32 appears to be supportive among those advocating for governmental transparency and equality. Proponents of the resolution argue that it addresses a crucial issue of fairness in legislation that often overlooks the rights of the average citizen. However, critics may suggest that simply memorializing a principle does not lead to substantial change in practice, emphasizing the need for actual reforms rather than declarations.

Contention

Notable points of contention surrounding HCR32 may include differing opinions on the effectiveness of such resolutions in prompting tangible changes in congressional behavior. Some legislators might argue that while the resolution’s intent is commendable, it lacks force and could be seen as merely symbolic. Others may raise concerns about the practicality of enforcing such principles and whether Congress can realistically adhere to a promise of equal applicability under the law without significant systemic changes in how legislation is formulated and enacted.