Memorializes the president, congress, and Federal Communications Commission to refrain from regulating Internet broadband services as common carrier services under Title II of the Communications Act of 1934
The resolution addresses the potential negative implications of reclassifying broadband services under Title II, suggesting that such regulation would slow down investments in Louisiana's broadband infrastructure and hinder job growth. The intent is to maintain the current regulatory environment that has allowed private enterprises to thrive and innovate without government interference. By reinforcing the unregulated status of broadband, Louisiana aims to continue benefiting from the rapid advancement of internet technology and its associated economic advantages.
House Resolution 127 urges the president of the United States, the U.S. Congress, and the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to avoid regulating broadband internet services as common carrier services under Title II of the Communications Act of 1934. The resolution emphasizes that the unregulated development of internet infrastructure over the past twenty-five years has been pivotal in transforming the livelihoods of Louisiana citizens and stimulating local economies. By calling to keep broadband services unregulated, the resolution seeks to encourage further growth and innovation in internet services across the state.
The sentiment around HR127 appears to be largely supportive among members who advocate for minimal governmental interference in the internet sector. Proponents believe that deregulation has led to substantial benefits and that maintaining this framework is crucial for continued technological innovation. However, the resolution's position may face opposition from groups advocating for greater regulatory oversight to ensure equitable access and prevent monopolistic practices in the broadband industry.
Notable points of contention revolve around the balance between promoting economic growth through deregulation and ensuring that all citizens have fair access to quality internet services. Proponents of HR127 argue against the imposition of common carrier regulations, fearing that it would stifle investment and development. Conversely, critics may argue that without certain regulations, there could be a risk of insufficient protections for consumers and communities, particularly in underserved areas. This debate underscores the ongoing tension between different regulatory philosophies concerning telecommunications and public access.