Louisiana 2010 Regular Session

Louisiana Senate Bill SB141

Introduced
3/29/10  
Refer
3/29/10  
Report Pass
5/24/10  
Engrossed
6/2/10  
Refer
6/3/10  
Report Pass
6/4/10  
Enrolled
6/17/10  
Chaptered
6/25/10  

Caption

Authorizes public entities utilizing tax increment finance ("TIF") to enter into a joint venture or cooperative endeavor with one or more other public entities utilizing TIF to utilize all or a portion of the tax increments generated within their TIF areas in order to jointly finance or refinance one or more economic development projects located within their TIF areas. (gov sig)

Impact

The amendment to existing laws regarding TIF allows local governmental subdivisions and other authorized entities to collectively finance and refinance projects. This change is expected to streamline financial processes and provide greater flexibility for public entities in managing resources for local development projects, which could accelerate economic growth. The bill defines the framework for leveraging tax increments, thereby promoting collaboration among local governments.

Summary

Senate Bill 141 authorizes public entities utilizing tax increment finance (TIF) to enter into joint ventures or cooperative endeavors with other public entities for the purpose of financing economic development projects. By allowing TIF districts to collaborate, the bill aims to enhance the efficient use of tax increments generated within their respective areas, potentially leading to more comprehensive and impactful economic initiatives.

Sentiment

General sentiment around SB 141 appears supportive, particularly among economic development advocates who view this collaboration as a means to maximize resources and promote growth. Supporters argue that joint ventures could lead to more robust economic strategies tailored to meet the needs of different areas. However, there is also concern regarding the governance of these endeavors and how they might impact local autonomy.

Contention

Notable points of contention may arise regarding the equitable distribution of resources and decision-making authority among involved entities. Critics could argue that the bill might prioritize larger districts or more affluent areas over smaller or economically disadvantaged communities, raising concerns about potential disparities in development benefits. The broader implications for local governance and the autonomy of individual TIF districts are also likely to be points of debate.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.