Louisiana Senate Bill SB162

Louisiana 2010 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/29/10
• Refer: 3/29/10
• Refer: 3/31/10
• Report Pass: 4/26/10
• Engrossed: 4/28/10
• Refer: 4/29/10
• Report Pass: 5/13/10
• Enrolled: 6/1/10
• Chaptered: 6/9/10
• Passed: 6/9/10

Caption

Specifies that the price gouging law also applies to sales of fuel to ultimate consumers from any facility other than a fixed facility, including sales in which fuel is sold from any container irrespective of type, form, or volume. (8/15/10)

Impact

The proposed changes would particularly affect businesses and individuals involved in fuel sales, especially those who operate outside of traditional service stations. By expanding the scope of price gouging regulations, the bill aims to close loopholes that could allow for unfair pricing strategies during emergencies. This extension could lead to more stringent monitoring of fuel prices and sales practices, ensuring that consumers are adequately protected regardless of where they purchase their fuel. If enacted, the legislation would bolster consumer protection measures in the state, particularly in the context of emergencies.

Summary

Senate Bill 162 aims to amend Louisiana's law regarding price gouging during declared states of emergency by extending the definition of price gouging to include the sale of gasoline and diesel fuel to ultimate consumers from non-traditional sales venues, such as containers. This legislation intends to protect consumers from potential exploitation during emergencies by ensuring that all fuel sales, regardless of the medium by which they are sold, are subject to scrutiny under the price gouging regulations. The bill highlights a commitment to ensuring fairness and preventing unscrupulous practices in times of crisis.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB 162 appears to be largely favorable, with support from both lawmakers and consumer advocacy groups who argue that the expansion of the price gouging definition is a necessary step to safeguard citizens during vulnerable times. There seems to be a collective agreement that such measures are essential for maintaining public trust and ensuring that price increases during emergencies are justifiable and not exploitative. However, there may be concerns from businesses about the potential implications and enforcement challenges that could arise from these expanded regulations.

Contention

One point of contention that may arise with SB 162 is the enforcement of the new provisions, particularly in determining what constitutes price gouging in non-traditional sales scenarios. Concerns may be voiced regarding how these regulations will be implemented and monitored by state authorities, especially when it comes to sales from containers versus fixed facilities. Additionally, opposition might stem from those in the fuel retail industry who argue that the regulations might impose restrictions that hinder their ability to respond flexibly to market conditions during emergencies.