Louisiana Senate Bill SB231

Louisiana 2010 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/29/10
• Refer: 3/29/10
• Report Pass: 4/12/10
• Engrossed: 4/14/10
• Refer: 4/15/10
• Report Pass: 5/27/10
• Enrolled: 6/16/10
• Chaptered: 6/22/10
• Passed: 6/22/10

Caption

Changes the name of certain tourist commissions. (gov sig)

Impact

The passage of SB 231 is expected to simplify the branding and recognition of tourist commissions in specified parishes, thus enhancing the visibility of local tourism efforts. By establishing a uniform naming structure, the bill seeks to facilitate better marketing and potentially increase tourism revenue in those areas, as visitors may find it easier to identify and engage with local tourist activities and offerings. This could encourage a more cohesive approach to tourism management in the affected parishes, promoting economic development as a result.

Summary

Senate Bill 231, introduced by Senator Nevers, aims to establish a specific designation for tourist commissions in certain parishes of Louisiana. The bill stipulates that any tourist commission created under the existing R.S. 33:4574 law in parishes with a population between 100,000 and 104,000, according to the most recent federal census, must be officially known as the name of the parish followed by '______ Parish Tourist Commission'. This change is intended to standardize naming conventions for tourist commissions throughout the state, providing clarity and consistency for tourists and stakeholders alike.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment surrounding SB 231 appears to be neutral to positive, with support likely coming from local government entities and tourism boards that see the benefit of standardized naming conventions. Legislative discussions surrounding the bill seem to underscore a collective understanding of the importance of clear communication in tourism marketing strategies, although specific details regarding opposition or contention were not detailed in available documents.

Contention

While no significant points of contention or opposition have been reported in the context of SB 231, it is important to recognize that any changes to local government structures or designations can evoke differing opinions from stakeholders. Commissions currently operating under different names may feel concern over the implications of this standardization, especially regarding identity and branding. However, no formal dissenting voices or significant debates have emerged in association with the bill as it progresses.