Louisiana Senate Bill SB254

Louisiana 2010 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/29/10
• Refer: 3/29/10
• Report Pass: 4/19/10
• Engrossed: 4/21/10
• Refer: 4/22/10
• Report Pass: 5/27/10
• Enrolled: 6/16/10
• Chaptered: 6/22/10
• Passed: 6/22/10

Caption

Allows local political subdivisions to purchase or lease hybrid fuel or alternative fuel vehicles. (8/15/10)

Impact

The legislation introduces specific mandates for local governments, requiring a gradual increase in the percentage of fleet vehicles capable of using alternative fuels. By implementing a phased approach with deadlines for fleet conversion, the bill is designed to foster a significant reduction in total vehicular emissions across localities. If political subdivisions find that meeting these requirements is economically unfeasible, the governing authority has the discretion to waive compliance. Therefore, while the law encourages the adoption of alternative fuel vehicles, it also allows flexibility in implementation.

Summary

Senate Bill 254 allows political subdivisions in Louisiana to purchase or lease hybrid fuel or alternative fuel vehicles. The bill mandates that these vehicles must reduce emissions of harmful pollutants, aligning with federal Clean Air standards. By enabling local governments to utilize such vehicles, the bill aims to promote environmental sustainability while also addressing air quality issues in local jurisdictions. This move is positioned as a step towards modernizing the fleet of governmental vehicles and embracing cleaner technologies.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding SB 254 appears to be positive, especially among environmental advocates who view it as a meaningful advancement in reducing air pollution and promoting cleaner air standards. Proponents believe that the bill can serve as a catalyst for further investment in alternative fuel technology and infrastructure. However, some concerns were raised regarding the practical implications for local governments, especially in terms of costs associated with transitioning fleets and establishing refueling stations for alternative fuels.

Contention

Notable points of contention focus on the stipulation that political subdivisions must achieve specific percentages of alternative fuel-capable vehicles by set deadlines. Critics worry that these mandates could place an undue burden on local governments, particularly in economically challenged areas where resources for such transitions might be limited. Discussion surrounding the bill also highlights potential disparities in access to alternative fuel technology and infrastructure, which raises questions about the uniform applicability of the mandates across diverse localities.