Louisiana 2010 Regular Session

Louisiana Senate Bill SB282

Introduced
3/29/10  
Refer
3/29/10  
Report Pass
4/20/10  
Engrossed
4/27/10  
Refer
4/28/10  
Report Pass
5/25/10  
Enrolled
6/14/10  
Chaptered
6/22/10  

Caption

Clarifies that to qualify as a juror a person not be under indictment for, nor convicted of a felony for which he has not been pardoned by the governor. (8/15/10)

Impact

The passage of SB282 would specifically impact laws related to juror qualifications, which could potentially reshape the landscape of jury service in Louisiana. By reinforcing the disqualification of certain individuals with felony convictions from serving as jurors, this bill may reduce the number of eligible jurors, thereby influencing jury composition and the criminal justice system's proceedings. It aligns with broader discussions on criminal justice reform, particularly regarding voting and jury rights for individuals with felony backgrounds.

Summary

Senate Bill 282 aims to clarify the qualifications for serving as a juror in Louisiana. Specifically, the bill stipulates that individuals who are currently under indictment for a felony, or who have been convicted of a felony and have not received a pardon from the governor, are disqualified from serving as jurors. This amendment to the Code of Criminal Procedure seeks to define more precisely the eligibility criteria for jurors, ensuring that those with serious criminal convictions do not participate in the jury process.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding SB282 appears to be supportive among those who advocate for clear legal definitions within the criminal justice system. Proponents argue that it is necessary to ensure that jurors meet specific moral and legal standards, thereby maintaining the integrity of the judicial process. However, critics may also emerge, raising concerns about the implications of such measures on the disenfranchisement of individuals with felony convictions, especially regarding their participation in civic duties such as jury service.

Contention

Notable points of contention could arise around the interpretation of the term 'pardon' and its implications for individuals seeking to reintegrate into society after serving their time. Some advocates for criminal justice reform might argue that requiring a pardon to regain juror eligibility constitutes an ongoing penalty for individuals who have already served their sentences. This discussion could reflect larger societal debates over rehabilitation, reintegration, and the civil rights of individuals with criminal records.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.