Louisiana 2010 Regular Session

Louisiana Senate Bill SB284

Introduced
3/29/10  
Refer
3/29/10  
Report Pass
5/4/10  
Engrossed
5/20/10  
Refer
5/24/10  
Report Pass
6/2/10  
Enrolled
6/17/10  
Chaptered
7/2/10  

Caption

Provides relative to foreign country defamation judgments. (8/15/10)

Impact

This bill significantly impacts state laws by establishing that Louisiana courts will have discretion to assess whether to recognize foreign defamation judgments. It provides criteria that include considerations of due process, notice to the defendant, and alignment with state public policy. If a foreign judgment does not meet these conditions, it can be disregarded by Louisiana courts, reinforcing the state's stance on protecting personal rights and freedoms under its laws.

Summary

Senate Bill No. 284 introduces provisions relating to the recognition of foreign defamation judgments within Louisiana. The bill defines 'foreign defamation judgment' as any judgment made outside the United States concerning cases of defamation, libel, or slander. It sets forth specific conditions under which these foreign judgments are not considered conclusive. For example, if the judgment was rendered in a jurisdiction lacking impartiality or due process, or if the court lacked personal or subject matter jurisdiction, the judgment may not be recognized by Louisiana courts.

Sentiment

Discussions around SB284 indicate a generally supportive sentiment among those emphasizing the importance of due process and protecting free speech. Proponents argue that the bill safeguards Louisiana residents from potentially unjust foreign judgments that may not align with the protective standards provided by state and federal law. Detractors, while not prominently documented in the available discussion, may raise concerns regarding the implications for international relations and the treatment of judgments from foreign courts.

Contention

Notably, one of the points of contention could arise from the implications of what constitutes an 'impartial tribunal' or 'due process' as defined within the bill. The ambiguity surrounding these terms may lead to challenges in application and interpretation in court cases, especially when dealing with foreign judgments. Additionally, the question of how this bill might affect diplomatic relations or legal agreements between nations concerning libel and slander cases could be a topic of debate among legal experts and policymakers.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB1200

Enforcement of judgments: renewal and interest.

AZ HB2297

Judgments; liens; homestead exemption

KY HB801

AN ACT relating to Canadian money judgments.

CA AB1119

Enforcement of judgments.

CA AB905

Money judgments of other jurisdictions.

CA SB642

Civil actions: renewal of judgments.

VA HB1234

Judgments; limitations on enforcement, extensions and renewals.

CA SB355

Judgment debtor employers: Employment Development Department.