Provides relative to the Louisiana Insurance Code. (8/15/10)
The impact of SB 317 on state laws is primarily procedural, as it concerns the codification of statutory language. By establishing a mandatory citation format, the bill aims to clarify the legal framework surrounding the Louisiana Insurance Code, which could improve the efficiency of referencing this code in legal proceedings and legislative matters. However, it does not propose significant changes to the substantive regulations governing the insurance industry itself, focusing instead on the structural aspects of how laws are communicated and referenced within the legal system.
Senate Bill 317, presented during the Regular Session of 2010, aims to amend and reenact a section of the Louisiana Insurance Code. The primary focus of the bill is to modify how the Louisiana Insurance Code is cited, changing the language from 'may be cited as' to 'shall be cited as'. This alteration signifies a shift towards a more definitive citation standard within state law, ensuring that the Louisiana Insurance Code has a clear and consistent reference point when invoked in legal contexts. The effective date for this change, if enacted, would be August 15, 2010.
The sentiment surrounding SB 317 appears to be neutral to positive, as the amendment is largely seen as a technical enhancement rather than a contentious policy change. Lawmakers and stakeholders involved in the discussion recognized the importance of clarity in legal citations, which could facilitate smoother interactions between stakeholders and the legal system. However, since the bill addresses a relatively niche concern, it garnered limited public attention compared to other more significant legislative topics.
There appears to be minimal contention associated with SB 317, given its narrow focus on citation language rather than on broader insurance policy or regulatory issues. The primary stakeholders—lawmakers and legal professionals—are likely to support the bill's provision for clarity and consistency. Overall, while there may be differing opinions on language in statutory texts, the procedural nature of the changes proposed in SB 317 suggests that it is unlikely to face significant opposition.