Louisiana Senate Bill SB381

Louisiana 2010 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/29/10
• Refer: 3/29/10
• Report Pass: 4/27/10
• Engrossed: 6/8/10
• Refer: 6/9/10
• Report Pass: 6/15/10
• Enrolled: 6/21/10
• Chaptered: 7/2/10
• Passed: 7/2/10

Caption

Provides relative to the crime against nature by solicitation. (8/15/10)

Impact

The implications of SB381 on state laws are significant, as it introduces stricter penalties for solicitation related to unnatural sexual acts. This could affect how law enforcement approaches such cases, potentially leading to increased prosecution for solicitation offenses. Additionally, by defining solicitation as a crime against nature, the bill may lead to a paradigm shift in how such offenses are viewed legally and socially, framing them as more serious and harmful, especially in cases involving minors. The mandatory registration as a sex offender for violations involving minors further emphasizes the state’s commitment to protecting vulnerable populations.

Summary

Senate Bill No. 381, introduced by Senator Morrell, amends existing laws regarding the crime against nature in the state of Louisiana. The bill establishes a new category of crime specifically for solicitation with the intent to engage in unnatural carnal copulation for compensation. It not only reiterates what constitutes a crime against nature but also imposes penalties for solicitation that escalate with the number of offenses. This means the law seeks to clarify and potentially enhance the punishment for such acts, especially when juveniles are involved. The penalties include fines and imprisonment, including registration as a sex offender upon certain convictions.

Sentiment

Discussion around SB381 appears to yield mixed sentiments among stakeholders. Advocates for the bill argue that it is a necessary measure to combat sexual crimes and protect children from exploitation. They emphasize the importance of holding offenders accountable and believe that stricter penalties will deter potential solicitors. Conversely, critics of the bill might raise concerns about the implications of labeling such offenses, particularly in relation to the stigma of sex offender registries and the potential for overreach in criminalizing consensual adult behavior. The polarized views reflect a broader societal debate on issues surrounding sexuality, morality, and law enforcement.

Contention

Notable points of contention regarding SB381 include concerns about the broad definitions used in the bill, which could lead to civil liberties issues. Opponents might question whether the scope of 'solicitation' could be interpreted too broadly, encompassing activities that are consensual among adults but are framed negatively under the law. Additionally, the penalties for solicitation, particularly those concerning individuals soliciting minors, raise ethical discussions about the balance between protecting children and ensuring that the rights of individuals are upheld. This complexity underscores the bill’s potential impact on future legislative discussions about human rights and legal definitions of consent.