Louisiana Senate Bill SB416

Louisiana 2010 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/29/10
• Refer: 3/29/10

Caption

Provides relative to the Louisiana Quality Jobs Program. (gov sig)

Impact

If signed into law, SB 416 would amend existing provisions relating to the Louisiana Quality Jobs Program, effectively allowing employers to maintain multiple quality job contracts while providing clarity on health care coverage requirements. The stipulation that dental and vision coverage counts towards the $1.25 per hour benefit value could incentivize employers to enhance their health benefits packages. Furthermore, by applying retroactively, the bill could bring changes to previously established contracts, potentially impacting ongoing economic arrangements for various employers.

Summary

Senate Bill 416, also known as the Louisiana Quality Jobs Program amendment, seeks to enhance the existing framework around economic development incentives for employers in Louisiana. The bill revises the definitions of 'employer' and 'health benefit plan' to ensure that businesses provide a basic health benefits plan valued at no less than $1.25 per hour for newly created direct jobs. Additionally, it allows for a waiting period of up to 180 days before employees receive health insurance coverage, aiming to strike a balance between business flexibility and employee welfare.

Sentiment

The discussion around SB 416 appears to be generally supportive among legislative members who prioritize economic growth and job creation. Proponents argue that by modernizing the requirements of the Quality Jobs Program, the bill will help attract and retain businesses in Louisiana, ultimately benefitting the state's economy. However, there may be concerns regarding the adequacy of health benefits provided during the initial waiting period for new employees, with critics possibly viewing this aspect as insufficient protection for workers.

Contention

A notable point of contention stems from the proposed waiting period for health benefits, which some might argue could undermine employee security, particularly for lower-wage workers who may be more dependent on immediate health coverage. Furthermore, while the bill encourages employer participation in the Quality Jobs Program, there might be fears that the flexibility granted to businesses could lead to variability in how health benefits are administered, potentially leaving employees at a disadvantage compared to more established job markets.