Require that an impact report accompany any legislative instrument which creates an additional financial burden on a hospital. (8/15/10)
Impact
The bill places a specific requirement on legislative processes concerning health-related legislation. By requiring impact reports for any bills that may financially affect hospitals, SB454 aims to create a transparent and informed approach to lawmaking in health care. This will lead to a more cautious assessment of financial burdens placed on hospitals, potentially influencing legislative decisions and prioritizing the fiscal stability of health services. Furthermore, the proposed law also stipulates that these instruments will need approval from the Committee on Finance or the Committee on Appropriations, adding an additional layer of scrutiny to financial impacts on state budgets.
Summary
Senate Bill 454, proposed by Senator Cheek, mandates that any legislative instrument that creates an additional financial burden on hospitals must be accompanied by an impact report before consideration by legislative committees. This report aims to provide a reliable estimate of the fiscal effects, both positive and negative, of the proposed legislation, including costs and savings associated with mandated health benefits. The goal is to ensure that the financial implications for hospitals are thoroughly examined prior to legislative approval, thereby preventing unexpected economic strains on these healthcare institutions.
Sentiment
The sentiment around SB454 appears to be generally supportive among lawmakers concerned with the fiscal health of hospitals and the broader implications of health insurance mandates. By mandating these reports, legislators are likely trying to protect hospitals from unexpected costs and ensure that any new regulations are viable. However, some concerns may arise regarding the potential delay in legislative processes due to these additional requirements, which could frustrate timely health care initiatives. Thus, while the intent is recognized as protective, the operational impact of these requirements on legislative efficiency could be a point of contention.
Contention
One notable point of contention surrounding SB454 lies in the balancing act between ensuring hospitals are not unduly burdened by new legislation and maintaining an efficient legislative process. Critics may argue that the requirement for comprehensive impact reports could slow down the introduction of necessary health benefits, leading to fewer legislative initiatives aimed at improving healthcare access. Moreover, there may also be concerns regarding the accuracy and reliability of the reports, as they depend on the data gathered by the legislative fiscal officer, potentially leading to disputes over the true financial impact of proposed mandates on hospitals.
Requires prefiling by January 15 of any legislative instrument which produces a net decrease in taxes, fees, charges or other revenues received by the state of $10 million or more annually in any one of the 5 fiscal years; a report by the proponents on the instrument's economic effects; and a review of such report by the legislative fiscal office.
Requires prefiling by January 15 of any legislative instrument which produces a net decrease in taxes, fees, charges or other revenues received by the state of $10 million or more annually in any one of the 5 fiscal years; a report by the proponents on the instrument's economic effects; and a review of such report by the legislative fiscal office.
Requires rebate impact notes on certain legislative instruments with a net decrease in revenues due to rebates by the state. (gov sig) (EG SEE FISC NOTE GF EX See Note)
Campaign finance: contributions and expenditures; provision related to officeholders raising funds when facing a recall; modify, and require candidate to establish a separate account used for recall purposes. Amends secs. 3, 11, 12, 21, 24 & 52 of 1976 PA 388 (MCL 169.203 et seq.) & adds sec. 21b.
Campaign finance: contributions and expenditures; funds donated to a candidate for recall efforts; require candidate to establish a separate account used for recall purposes. Amends secs. 3, 11, 12, 21, 24 & 52 of 1976 PA 388 (MCL 169.203 et seq.) & adds sec. 21b.
A concurrent resolution recognizing wild rice as sacred and central to the culture and health of Indigenous Peoples in Minnesota and critical to the health and identity of all Minnesota citizens and ecosystems and establishing a commitment to passing legislation to protect wild rice and the freshwater resources upon which it depends.