Louisiana Senate Bill SB519

Louisiana 2010 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/29/10
• Refer: 3/29/10

Caption

Provides that GOHSEP employees are unclassified. (see Act)

Impact

The implications of SB 519 on state laws are significant, as it consolidates authority over GOHSEP personnel within the executive branch, emphasizing the governor's control over this critical office. The combination of the proposed law with the constitutional amendment also raises questions about the future of state employee classifications, specifically in how it relates to oversight, accountability, and operational stability within GOHSEP during emergencies. By establishing that GOHSEP employees serve directly under the governor, it effectively alters the employment landscape within state emergency management.

Summary

Senate Bill 519 proposes amendments to the existing law regarding the Governor's Office of Homeland Security and Emergency Preparedness (GOHSEP) in Louisiana. The bill aims to formally classify all current and future employees of GOHSEP, including the director and deputy director, as unclassified state service employees. This classification means that these individuals would serve at the pleasure of the governor, placing them under the complete authority of the state executive. The bill is tied to a broader constitutional amendment that must be adopted for it to take effect, which generates additional legislative interest and scrutiny.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB 519 is mixed. Proponents argue that establishing GOHSEP employees as unclassified ensures quick decision-making and accountability during emergencies, as the governor can directly manage personnel without bureaucratic delays. Critics, on the other hand, express concerns regarding the potential for politicization of emergency management in Louisiana, fearing that vital operational independence may be compromised. The debate is indicative of broader tensions between governance efficiency and the safeguarding of employee rights and protections.

Contention

Despite the benefits cited by supporters, there are notable points of contention regarding the bill. Detractors argue that classifying GOHSEP employees as unclassified could lead to instability, as staff may be removed based on political considerations rather than performance or qualifications. This may undermine the effectiveness of the state's emergency preparedness and response capabilities. Additionally, the requirement for voter approval of the related constitutional amendment adds an additional layer of complexity and uncertainty around the bill's potential implementation.