Louisiana 2010 Regular Session

Louisiana Senate Bill SB540

Introduced
3/29/10  
Refer
3/29/10  
Report Pass
4/21/10  
Engrossed
4/26/10  
Refer
4/27/10  
Report Pass
5/11/10  
Enrolled
5/24/10  
Chaptered
6/1/10  

Caption

Provides for the removal of dedication of cemetery property. (8/15/10)

Impact

The bill's enactment would have significant implications for state laws governing the handling and dedication of cemetery properties. By codifying the requirement for judicial oversight when seeking to remove cemetery property dedication, the bill enhances protections for unmarked burial sites. This aligns state laws more closely with heritage conservation efforts and acknowledges the historical significance of such sites, preventing unauthorized alterations or removals.

Summary

Senate Bill 540, introduced by Senator Walsworth, aims to amend the Louisiana Revised Statutes concerning the dedication of property for cemetery purposes. The bill establishes a clear legislative intent prioritizing the protection of unmarked human burial sites. It provides specific procedures for removing the dedication of cemetery property, requiring judicial proceedings that notify the Louisiana Division of Archaeology and the Attorney General, ensuring oversight and protection of sensitive burial sites.

Sentiment

The sentiment around SB540 appears to be supportive, especially among advocates for historical preservation and archaeological integrity. Stakeholders appreciate the emphasis on protecting unmarked burial sites, viewing it as a necessary step towards safeguarding cultural heritage. However, as with many legislative measures, there may be some concerns regarding the bureaucratic processes involved in removing property dedication, which could delay desired developments in certain areas.

Contention

Some potential points of contention may arise regarding the balance between property rights and the imperative to protect unmarked human burial sites. Property owners wishing to utilize dedicated cemetery land might express frustrations over the constraints imposed by this legislation. Moreover, the requirement for judicial proceedings could introduce delays and complications that conflict with real estate development or land use objectives. Ensuring a transparent and efficient process for both property rights and cultural preservation will likely be a topic of discussion.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.