Louisiana 2010 Regular Session

Louisiana Senate Bill SB684

Introduced
3/31/10  
Refer
3/31/10  
Report Pass
4/13/10  
Engrossed
4/21/10  
Refer
4/22/10  
Report Pass
6/15/10  
Enrolled
6/21/10  
Chaptered
7/2/10  

Caption

Provides relative to the conduct of examinations and execution of emergency commitment certificates in certain parishes. (gov sig)

Impact

The bill is particularly focused on parishes with populations between 191,000 and 192,000 residents, indicating targeted legislative attention to accommodate regions with specific demographic needs. By allowing remote evaluations through telemedicine, the law seeks to enhance access to mental health services, especially for individuals confined in emergency situations. The shift toward telemedicine could also alleviate some burdens on physical resources and personnel in emergency settings while maintaining compliance with healthcare standards.

Summary

Senate Bill No. 684, introduced by Senator Crowe, aims to amend and reenact provisions of Louisiana law concerning coroners and their practices related to emergency commitment certificates. This bill lays out new protocols for the examination of patients admitted by emergency certificate, particularly emphasizing conditions under which telemedicine may be utilized for these examinations. If enacted, the bill allows designated coroners or deputy coroners, preferably psychiatrists, to conduct examinations via video conferencing under specific conditions, thereby modernizing the commitment process and potentially improving the speed and efficiency of care in urgent situations.

Sentiment

The reception of SB684 appears to be generally supportive, particularly among those interested in mental health reform and the application of modern technology in medical evaluations. Proponents argue that telemedicine can lead to more timely evaluations, ensuring that individuals in crisis receive the necessary care without the delays associated with in-person examinations. However, there may be underlying concerns about the adequacy of remote assessments and the preservation of patient rights in these circumstances, which could manifest in opposition from mental health advocacy groups focused on patient welfare.

Contention

Notably, the bill specifies that an in-person examination must occur within seventy-two hours of commitment, which may raise concerns about the logistics of such a timeline, especially in rural parishes with limited resources. Furthermore, the requirements for telemedicine—such as having a licensed healthcare professional present during the video examination—highlight the need for stringent operational protocols to safeguard patient rights and ensure high-quality evaluations. Critics may question whether the bill effectively balances the need for rapid response in mental health crises with the assurance of thorough and compassionate care.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.