Extends until December 31, 2014 the $1,000,000 contract limit for any contract by a public entity for levees not maintained with federal funds or to perform mitigation on public lands if the project is undertaken with the public entity's own resources and employees or with the resources and employees of another public entity through an agreement with another public entity. (gov sig)
The impact of SB 708 on state laws is significant as it pertains to the regulation of public contracts for levee construction and maintenance. By extending the contract limit until December 31, 2014, it aims to facilitate the completion of essential levee projects that may not otherwise receive federal funding. This amendment presents an opportunity for local public entities to undertake important flood protection efforts autonomously, thereby enhancing their operational flexibility.
Senate Bill 708, introduced by Senator Chabert, focuses on public contracts associated with levee projects that are not maintained with federal funds. The bill amends the existing law to extend the termination date for contracts awarded for levee restoration and rehabilitation projects. Specifically, it allows for a $1,000,000 contract limit for any public entity undertaking such projects using their own resources or in agreement with other public entities while performing mitigation on public lands.
The general sentiment surrounding SB 708 is expected to be pragmatic, predominantly supported by legislators and local governments that recognize the necessity of managing levee systems effectively without sole reliance on federal provisions. While proponents argue that this approach empowers local entities, there may be concerns about accountability and the adequacy of funding not augmented by federal support, leading to discussions on ensuring sustained resource allocation.
Notable points of contention could arise over the delegation of responsibilities and the potential risks associated with local entities undertaking such significant infrastructure projects without federal oversight. Critics may raise concerns about financial management, the adequacy of local expertise, and the long-term sustainability of levee systems maintained through state or local funds as opposed to the federal support typically provided for larger-scale projects.