Louisiana Senate Bill SB730

Louisiana 2010 Regular Session

• Introduced: 4/20/10
• Refer: 4/20/10
• Report Pass: 5/24/10

Caption

Provides relative to the South Burbank Crime Prevention and Development District. (7/1/10)

Impact

The proposed amendments would significantly alter the existing framework under which the South Burbank Crime Prevention District operates. By allowing for an increased fee period, the district is expected to have a more stable and long-term funding source, thus enhancing the ability to implement and maintain crime prevention measures effectively over a more extended timeframe. Additionally, the bill seeks to streamline the reporting and collection processes related to parcel fees, aiming to improve administrative efficiency and responsiveness.

Summary

Senate Bill 730, authored by Senator Dorsey, aims to amend existing laws pertaining to the South Burbank Crime Prevention and Development District in East Baton Rouge Parish. This legislation primarily addresses adjustments to the boundaries of the district, governance structure, and regulation of parcel fees. It proposes increased flexibility in the collection and renewal of fees associated with properties within the district, extending the renewal period from four to ten years. This change aims to simplify the administrative process for collecting fees, which are critical for funding local crime prevention initiatives.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB 730 appears generally supportive from local governance and law enforcement circles, as the changes are viewed as beneficial for enhancing community safety and development initiatives. However, there may be underlying concerns regarding the long-term implications of extending the fee renewal period, particularly among residents who may worry about the financial impact of increased or prolonged fees. Overall, the bill seems to be positioned as a proactive step towards addressing community safety issues, with support stemming from its perceived local benefits.

Contention

Notable points of contention surrounding the bill pertain to the governance structure changes. Reducing the board of commissioners from eleven to seven members could raise questions about representation and inclusivity in decision-making for the district. Some stakeholders may worry that this consolidation of authority could limit community input and oversight in local governance, thereby affecting the effectiveness of crime prevention initiatives. Furthermore, concerns may arise about how the proposed fee structure will be perceived by property owners within the district, particularly regarding equity and fairness in taxation.