Louisiana 2010 Regular Session

Louisiana Senate Bill SB744

Introduced
4/20/10  
Refer
4/20/10  
Report Pass
5/17/10  
Engrossed
5/20/10  
Refer
5/24/10  
Report Pass
6/15/10  
Enrolled
6/20/10  
Chaptered
6/29/10  

Caption

Exempts certain funds in existing qualified tuition programs from attachment, levy, garnishment or legal process. (8/15/10)

Impact

The enactment of SB744 would significantly impact Louisiana's state laws regarding personal financial security, particularly in the domain of educational savings. By exempting funds from being subject to garnishment and other legal processes, the bill provides a layer of protection for families saving for education. This means that even in cases of financial distress—such as bankruptcy—these education savings accounts would remain intact and accessible for educational expenses, promoting greater stability in funding education.

Summary

Senate Bill 744 aims to amend the Louisiana Revised Statutes by providing specific protections for funds held in qualified tuition programs, such as education savings accounts. The bill stipulates that assets within these accounts will be exempt from attachment, levy, garnishment, or any other legal processes. This protection is particularly relevant for program participants, owners, and contributors, intending to ensure that these funds remain secure against creditors' claims and various financial pressures.

Sentiment

The sentiment around SB744 appears supportive among advocates for educational savings and financial security. Proponents argue that the bill is a necessary measure to encourage families to save for education without the worry of losing those funds to debt collection. Conversely, there may be concerns among critics regarding the implications of such a measure for bankruptcy proceedings and the potential for abuse, though these concerns seem to be less pronounced in the discussions surrounding the bill.

Contention

While the discussions surrounding SB744 do not indicate significant contention, it is essential to recognize that proposals like this often attract scrutiny regarding their broader implications for creditors and debtors. Critics might question whether this legislation could inadvertently shield funds from legitimate claims, thereby raising issues about fairness in financial obligations. Ultimately, the focus remains squarely on enhancing the security of educational savings without undermining the interests of stakeholders affected by the broader financial system.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.