Requires budget requests and the executive budget include information on unclassified employees and requires Joint Legislative Committee on the Budget approval of the creation of new unclassified positions. (7/1/10) (OR NO IMPACT GF EX See Note)
Impact
The proposed amendment is expected to improve accountability within state governance by providing lawmakers with clear insight into personnel costs associated with unclassified positions. This could potentially lead to more informed decisions regarding budget allocations and the management of state resources. The requirement for legislative approval concerning the creation of new unclassified positions is set to strengthen oversight, aiming to prevent unnecessary increases in state payroll and ensure that all personnel additions align with budgetary constraints.
Summary
Senate Bill 764 aims to enhance transparency and oversight in budgetary procedures by mandating that all budget requests and the executive budget contain detailed information relating to unclassified employees. This information will include the titles, job duties, and salaries of these employees for the last fiscal year, the existing operating budget, and forecasts for the upcoming fiscal year. The bill further stipulates that any new positions within the unclassified service require the approval of the Joint Legislative Committee on the Budget, thus ensuring legislative oversight on personnel expenditures.
Sentiment
Generally, the sentiment around SB 764 appears to be constructive among its supporters, who argue it facilitates better governance through enhanced accountability. However, concerns may arise from those who view the additional bureaucratic measures as potential barriers to necessary staffing. These individuals might argue that such requirements could delay critical hiring processes and complicate the operational flexibility of state departments, particularly in times of urgent staffing needs.
Contention
Notable contention may arise from debates about the potential for bureaucratic red tape. Critics may worry that enforcing legislative approval for new unclassified positions might stifle departments’ ability to respond swiftly to workforce needs, particularly in areas where specialized skills are required. Conversely, proponents maintain that oversight is vital for fiscal responsibility and transparency, especially in a climate where state budgets are closely scrutinized and often under pressure due to economic constraints.
Requires approval of the Joint Legislative Committee on the Budget before certain salary increases to unclassified employees in the executive branch are effective in the last ninety days of an administration. (7/1/16) (EN SEE FISC NOTE GF EX See Note)
Provides for the requirement of the division of administration to produce a non-discretionary adjusted standstill budget. (7/1/17) (EN SEE FISC NOTE GF EX See Note)
Constitutional amendment to provide for persons in the unclassified service and for appointment of persons on the State Civil Service Commission. (2/3 - CA13s1(A))
Requests reports for the three branches of state government to be submitted to the Department of State Civil Service concerning methods for and information about pay of unclassified employees
Requests establishment of pay systems and procedures for classified and unclassified state employees that provide for cost-of-living increases and rewards for performance and clearly distinguish between them
Requests state departments, the division of administration, and Board of Regents to submit reports to the Dept. of State Civil Service concerning methods used and information about pay increases for unclassified employees