Create a Coroner's Strategic Initiative for a Health Information and Intervention Program in the office of the coroner in each parish. (8/15/10)
The bill fundamentally alters the operational scope of coroner's offices in relevant parishes, empowering them to provide support services that bridge the gap between treatment facilities and individuals in need of ongoing mental health care. By enabling coroners to perform home visits and facilitate access to mental health resources, SB803 aims to implement a proactive approach to public health. Additionally, by amending public records laws pertinent to the information handled by the CSI/HIP, the bill seeks to protect patient confidentiality in critical health matters, thus balancing public safety and individual rights.
Senate Bill 803 aims to establish a Coroner's Strategic Initiative for a Health Information and Intervention Program (CSI/HIP) within the coroner's office of parishes with populations between 191,000 and 200,000. This initiative is designed to enhance support systems for individuals dealing with mental health and substance abuse issues by providing home-based support and community resource centers. The bill outlines the powers and duties of the program, emphasizing the importance of consent and confidentiality, particularly regarding health information. Furthermore, it sets forth the establishment of an advisory board to guide the initiatives of the CSI/HIP in each parish.
The sentiment surrounding SB803 appears to be generally positive, with support from mental health advocates and community organizations that recognize the need for enhanced mental health care frameworks. Proponents of the bill laud it as a progressive step towards better mental health resource allocation and intervention strategies. However, concerns remain regarding the implementation of such programs, particularly with respect to adequate funding and the potential overreach of coroner duties into personal health matters.
Notable contention regarding SB803 arises from the delicate balance between necessary intervention and protecting individual rights. Critics argue that while the intentions of the CSI/HIP are commendable, there must be comprehensive oversight and clear guidelines to prevent misuse of the coroner's authority. Issues surrounding the limits of liability for personnel involved in these programs also spark debate, as they could either encourage necessary acts of support or risk significant legal challenges if care is not properly administered.