Provides for a study regarding the order by which individuals can direct the manner and disposition of the remains of a military decedent.
Impact
The implementation of SCR105 has potential implications for Louisiana's laws concerning the remains of military personnel. With the resolution’s passing, a comprehensive study aims to clarify the legal relationships between state law and the directives outlined by the Department of Defense. The outcome may result in legislative recommendations intended to harmonize state and federal law concerning military interments, thereby reducing legal ambiguities that can arise when families are grieving and making decisions about remains.
Summary
Senate Concurrent Resolution No. 105 (SCR105) addresses the complexities surrounding the disposition of remains for military decedents. It authorizes a study by the Senate Select Committee on Veterans' Affairs and the House Special Committee on Military and Veterans' Affairs to explore how individuals can direct the manner and disposition of these remains. Currently, Louisiana law outlines a specific hierarchy of individuals who retain the right to control interment while also accounting for the statutory procedures outlined by the United States Department of Defense, which allows service members to designate a person responsible for their remains. This overlap may lead to conflicts in authority during such sensitive circumstances.
Sentiment
The sentiment surrounding SCR105 appears supportive among legislators who recognize the importance of addressing this sensitive issue. The significant focus on military veterans and their families signifies an acknowledgment of the unique circumstances they face, and a desire to resolve conflicts in the law that can add to their burdens during difficult times. Overall, the resolution reflects a proactive approach to ensure that veterans and their families have clear rights and procedures regarding the disposition of remains.
Contention
Although SCR105 presents a constructive agenda to address the order of control for military remains, discussions within the study may uncover points of contention regarding the rights of relatives versus those established in military regulations. There may be differing views on how to integrate familial rights with federal statutes, which could lead to debates on the balance between state jurisdiction and military protocols. The study's findings could potentially ignite further legislative action to modify existing laws, depending on the recommendations made to the Senate and House.
An Act Concerning Military Or Veteran Status On State-issued Forms And Publications, Benefits For Veterans And State Employees Called To Active Service And The Disposition Of Remains Of Members Of The Armed Forces.