Louisiana Senate Bill SCR33

Louisiana 2010 Regular Session

• Introduced: 4/7/10
• Refer: 4/7/10
• Report Pass: 4/26/10
• Passed: 4/27/10
• Engrossed: 4/27/10
• Refer: 4/28/10

Caption

Directs the division of administration to publicly disclose the savings to be achieved by outsourcing services currently performed by state employees and the benefits that the contractor will be providing its employees prior to entering any contract outsourcing such services. (OR NO IMPACT See Note)

Impact

The passage of SCR33 could significantly affect state laws related to the administration and contracting of public services. By enforcing transparency regarding financial implications and employee benefits during outsourcing, the bill seeks to ensure that any cost savings from privatization do not come at the expense of service quality or employee welfare. The potential for layoffs among state employees raises concerns about economic consequences as displaced workers may struggle to find comparable employment.

Summary

SCR33 aims to direct the division of administration in Louisiana to publicly disclose the savings anticipated from outsourcing services currently handled by state employees. Additionally, the bill mandates that the benefits offered to employees of the contractor providing these services be reported before any contract is finalized. This initiative emerged in response to the financial challenges faced by Louisiana, prompting an examination of alternatives to enhance state operational efficiencies.

Sentiment

Discussion surrounding SCR33 is mixed, reflecting a divide between proponents who see it as a way to foster fiscal responsibility and those who fear it could compromise employee security and service quality. Supporters argue that the requirement for full disclosure before outsourcing decisions will lead to more informed choices that benefit the state’s financial health. Conversely, opponents caution that these measures may inadvertently prioritize cost-cutting over quality service delivery, leading to a reduction in public satisfaction.

Contention

Notably, there is contention surrounding the implications of transitioning service responsibilities from state employees to private contractors. Critics worry about the potential layoffs and the adequacy of benefits offered by new employers, as there are no guarantees that displaced employees will find suitable positions. The bill emphasizes the necessity of a comprehensive analysis of the outsourcing costs before implementation, stirring a debate on the balance between economic efficiency and protecting public sector jobs.