Directs the Department of Health and Hospitals to investigate, study, and develop a plan or strategy to modernize and improve the state developmental disability centers, focusing particularly on an assessment of the current operation and maintenance of the existing developmental disability centers.
The resolution underlines that Louisiana must deliver care to individuals with developmental disabilities in a cost-efficient manner. Currently, the state spends a considerable amount on services in existing facilities that may not be optimal for the residents. By focusing on modernizing these centers, the bill aims to enhance service delivery while potentially reducing costs. Additionally, the strategy proposed by the Department of Health and Hospitals will explore various operational concepts, including the possible sale of excess property, thereby ensuring financial prudence.
SCR77 is a Senate Concurrent Resolution that directs the Department of Health and Hospitals in Louisiana to investigate and propose a plan for the modernization and improvement of state developmental disability centers. The resolution emphasizes the need for assessing the current operational state of these facilities, which are outdated and often in disrepair, in order to determine the feasibility of either repairing or replacing them. This initiative is positioned as a necessary step to align with contemporary best practices in care, particularly as advancements in treatment protocols evolve.
The sentiment surrounding SCR77 is largely supportive among advocates for individuals with developmental disabilities, as it seeks to improve their living conditions and care. There is recognition of the emotional and psychological impact that residing in deteriorating facilities can have on residents. By prioritizing a more individualized and inclusive approach in smaller, modern facilities, the resolution reflects a shift in philosophy towards more humane treatment options. While there are no explicit opposing comments recorded in the discussions available, concerns regarding the potential displacement of residents during modernization efforts may arise if not addressed adequately.
A prominent point of contention that may surface is the debate over the funding and logistics of effectively modernizing existing facilities without displacing the current residents who often view these centers as their home. The logistical challenges of transitioning residents to new environments, especially when many have lived in these facilities for an extended duration, could evoke emotional resistance. Furthermore, the specifics of how the department will balance modernization efforts while maintaining care during this transitional phase could be subjects of significant scrutiny in future discussions.