Louisiana Senate Bill SR11

Louisiana 2010 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/31/10
• Refer: 3/31/10
• Report Pass: 5/26/10
• Passed: 6/2/10

Caption

Provides relative to adopting an earlier prefiling date for legislation related to retirement.

Impact

The amendment to Senate Rule No. 9.1 represents a shift in how retirement legislation is managed within the Louisiana Senate. By implementing stricter deadlines for prefiling, the Senate aims to ensure that such legislation is presented and considered in a timely manner. This could facilitate better planning and discussion around retirement issues and ensure that they are adequately addressed before the regular session begins, potentially impacting the efficacy of legislative responses to retirement-related matters.

Summary

Senate Resolution No. 11, introduced by Senator Guillory, aims to amend the Rules of Order of the Senate specifically concerning the prefiling timeline for legislation related to retirement. The bill stipulates that this type of legislation must be prefiled no later than five o'clock p.m. on the forty-fifth calendar day prior to the commencement of the regular session. This change is intended to standardize the legislative process and provide clear timelines for the introduction of retirement-related bills.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SR11 appears to be neutral to positive, as it is seen as a procedural enhancement rather than a contentious policy change. There is a general understanding among legislators that timely consideration of retirement issues is critical, and therefore, this resolution could be positively received as it promotes better legislative efficiency. However, there may also be concerns regarding the rigidity of deadlines potentially stifling innovative legislative efforts that arise closer to the session.

Contention

While the bill itself does not seem to present significant points of contention, the implementation of a stricter prefiling deadline could raise concerns among legislators about their ability to respond to emerging retirement issues. Opponents may argue that this change limits flexibility and could prevent important legislation from being introduced at the last minute, reflecting the dynamic nature of legislative priorities. Nevertheless, specific conflicts or debates over the bill have not been reported.