Louisiana 2011 1st Special Session

Louisiana House Bill HB25

Introduced
3/20/11  
Refer
3/20/11  
Report Pass
3/21/11  
Engrossed
3/24/11  
Report Pass
3/30/11  
Enrolled
4/6/11  
Chaptered
4/14/11  

Caption

Provides relative to provisions in Title 27 which are limited in applicability to political subdivisions or local areas meeting specified population characteristics (Item #8)

Impact

The enactment of HB 25 will have a significant impact on the way gambling operations are regulated in smaller parishes, specifically St. Bernard Parish, which falls within the population scope defined in the bill. It allows local authorities greater control and the ability to implement gaming operations tailored to their jurisdiction's needs, potentially fostering local economic growth. Increased gaming revenues may also support local budgets and projects.

Summary

House Bill 25 is aimed at amending provisions related to gaming establishments in Louisiana, specifically within Title 27 of the Louisiana Gaming Control Law. The bill modifies existing regulations that are based on the population characteristics of certain political subdivisions or local areas, thereby expanding the applicability of these provisions. It stipulates that local governing authorities in parishes with populations between 62,000 and 68,000 will have designated rights concerning gaming operations, including the allocation of admission fees.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 25 appears largely supportive among legislators interested in enhancing local governance and economic opportunity. However, there may be some dissent from individuals concerned about the social implications of expanding gaming regulations, underscoring a balance between economic development and community welfare. This reflects a common debate in legislative contexts where local governance intersects with issues of public policy and community health.

Contention

Notable contention could arise from differing opinions on the expansion of gaming jurisdiction and its societal implications. Opponents may argue that increasing gaming regulations could lead to adverse effects, such as gambling addiction or the socio-economic challenges it could impose on smaller communities. Additionally, the bill's provisions could be viewed as complicating the existing landscape of Louisiana's gaming regulations, which have been historically guided by strict population thresholds.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.