Louisiana 2011 1st Special Session

Louisiana Senate Bill SB8

Introduced
3/20/11  
Refer
3/20/11  
Report Pass
3/22/11  
Engrossed
3/25/11  
Refer
3/27/11  
Report Pass
3/30/11  
Enrolled
4/6/11  
Chaptered
4/14/11  

Caption

Provides relative to provisions in the Code of Civil Procedure which are limited in applicability to political subdivisions or local areas meeting specified population characteristics.

Impact

The impact of SB 8 is twofold. Firstly, by limiting the applicability of the existing laws to larger municipalities, it highlights a distinct classification based on population size, potentially creating a framework for local governments to manage property seizures more effectively. Secondly, it could have implications for individuals and entities subject to such legal actions, ensuring they have a clear timeline and understanding of their rights and obligations under this specific procedure.

Summary

Senate Bill 8, introduced by Senator Quinn, amends the Code of Civil Procedure specifically regarding the time limitations for seizing property under a writ of fieri facias in Orleans Parish. The bill establishes that such a seizure can only be executed within six months from the issuance of the writ in cities with a population exceeding 475,000. This legislative change aims to provide clarity and ensure timely enforcement of legal orders in areas with significant population sizes.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding SB 8 appears to be neutral, with the bill being passed unanimously in the House with 87 votes in favor and none against. This suggests that there is a shared agreement among legislators that the changes proposed are beneficial for legal consistency and operational clarity within the specified jurisdiction. However, the bill's limited scope may be a point of consideration for some, particularly regarding its applicability based on population size.

Contention

A notable point of contention may arise with the specific population threshold that defines the applicability of this bill. While this criterion is intended to streamline procedures in larger cities, it raises questions about the legislative intent behind distinguishing between jurisdictions based on population size. Critics may argue that such a division could lead to disparities in legal processes and protections afforded to residents, depending on where they live.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.