Louisiana 2011 Regular Session

Louisiana House Bill HB118

Introduced
4/25/11  
Refer
4/25/11  
Report Pass
5/11/11  
Engrossed
5/17/11  
Refer
5/18/11  
Report Pass
6/7/11  
Enrolled
6/15/11  
Chaptered
6/20/11  

Caption

Amends the crime of illegal use of counterfeit trademark

Impact

The bill's passage will have significant implications for state laws governing trademark infringement. It solidifies the legal framework surrounding the illegal use of counterfeit trademarks, thereby reinforcing penalties for offenders. This change aims to deter the sale and distribution of counterfeit goods, which can harm legitimate businesses and consumers alike. The new provision could lead to an increase in prosecutions related to counterfeit merchandise as law enforcement and judicial processes adapt to the updated legal standards.

Summary

House Bill 118 seeks to amend the crime of illegal use of a counterfeit trademark in Louisiana, expanding its definition and associated penalties. The bill introduces 'possession with the intent to sell' as part of the elements constituting the crime, thus closing a potential loophole that could allow individuals to evade prosecution under existing law. By including intent to sell as a crucial aspect of the offense, the bill aims to strengthen enforcement against violations of trademark laws and enhance protection for intellectual property rights in the state.

Sentiment

The general sentiment regarding HB 118 appears to be supportive among legislators, particularly those concerned with protecting businesses and consumers from counterfeit entities. The bill has received a favorable voting record, with passage achieved unanimously in its final Senate vote, indicating bipartisan support for tightening trademark enforcement. However, discussion around the implications of the expanded definitions may have raised some concerns among those wary of overreach in criminal laws.

Contention

Despite its broad support, concerns were raised about the potential for the bill to inadvertently lead to overcriminalization. Critics argue that by expanding the definition of illegal trademark use, there could be unintended consequences for small business owners who may inadvertently come into contact with counterfeit goods. Ensuring that enforcement officers and courts can distinguish between willful violations and innocent mistakes will be essential to mitigate these risks.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.