Louisiana House Bill HB44

Louisiana 2011 Regular Session

• Introduced: 4/25/11
• Refer: 4/25/11

Caption

Appropriates funds for payment of judgment in the matter of "James B. Ambrose v. Daniel W. Holloway, et al"

Impact

The enactment of HB44 would authorize the state to disburse funds that have been judicially mandated, ensuring that legal settlements are honored. This legislative action highlights the state's approach to managing legal risks and liabilities that arise from operations conducted by various state departments. By appropriating specific funds for this judgment, the bill ensures that necessary financial mechanisms are in place to uphold legal agreements and prevent potential further litigations or disruptions in services provided by the DOTD.

Summary

House Bill 44 aims to appropriate funds from the state general fund of Louisiana for the fiscal year 2011-2012 specifically to cover a consent judgment awarded in the case of 'James B. Ambrose v. Daniel W. Holloway, et al.' The amount earmarked for this expenditure is $20,000, which is directed towards resolving a legal obligation faced by the Department of Transportation and Development (DOTD). This bill reflects the state's commitment to fulfill its financial responsibilities stemming from judicial rulings.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB44 appears relatively neutral and focused primarily on legal and fiscal responsibility. The discussions relating to this bill likely center on the obligation to honor court judgments, without much contention as it addresses a specific legal case rather than introducing new regulations or policies. Consequently, the attention on this bill is less about ideological divides and more about fulfilling statutory obligations.

Contention

While HB44 primarily focuses on settling a specific consent judgment, it may bring up broader discussions regarding state accountability and the financial implications of legal settlements on the state's budget. Notably, there could be conversations regarding the importance of maintaining transparency in how state funds are appropriated to meet legal obligations, which can influence taxpayer perceptions of government efficiency and accountability.