Louisiana House Bill HB66

Louisiana 2011 Regular Session

• Introduced: 4/25/11
• Refer: 4/25/11

Caption

Appropriates funds for payment of judgment against the state in the matter of "Bonita Woods v. Calvin Williams, et al"

Impact

The enactment of HB 66 is significant as it provides the necessary financial resources for addressing this specific legal judgment. By appropriating funds to satisfy the judgment, the bill serves to fulfill the obligations of the state regarding court decisions, which is essential to maintaining the rule of law and accountability of state entities. This act, while seemingly minor in financial terms, underscores the importance of financial management and legislative action in the context of legal settlements involving governmental entities.

Summary

House Bill 66 appropriates a sum of $6,500 from the General Fund of the State of Louisiana for the fiscal year 2011-2012. The allocated funds are designated for the payment of a consent judgment in the legal case 'Bonita Woods v. Calvin Williams, et al.' This measure aims to cover the financial obligations resulting from a court ruling against the state, thereby ensuring compliance with judicial decisions and the prompt settlement of financial liabilities stemming from state actions.

Sentiment

The sentiment around HB 66 is likely to be neutral, as it deals primarily with a financial appropriation that is a standard legislative procedure for managing state obligations arising from legal actions. There is no significant opposition or contention surrounding this specific bill, as it represents the routine fulfillment of legal commitments. However, stakeholders involved in the lawsuit may view the prompt payment as a resolution to ongoing disputes.

Contention

Since the bill concerns an appropriation to settle a consent judgment, the main point of contention could be on the broader implications of state liabilities and how they impact budget allocations in other areas. While there may not be active opposition to this bill, discussions surrounding state financial management practices and the need for oversight on expenditures related to court judgments could arise, particularly in the context of fiscal responsibility.