Louisiana House Bill HB1160

Louisiana 2012 Regular Session

• Introduced: 4/3/12
• Refer: 4/4/12

Caption

Appropriates funds for payment of judgment in the matter of "Calvin Williams v. State of Louisiana"

Impact

The implementation of HB 1160 is significant as it formalizes state funding to satisfy a legal decision related to wrongful incarceration. This action not only underscores the judicial determination of the individual's grievance but also serves as a precedent for future cases where individuals seek compensatory funds for wrongful imprisonment. By financially supporting the affected party, the state aims to rectify past injustices, thereby reinforcing a commitment to uphold legal responsibilities towards wrongfully convicted citizens.

Summary

House Bill 1160 proposes the appropriation of $65,000 from the state's General Fund for the payment of a judgment awarded in the legal case 'Calvin Williams v. State of Louisiana'. This judgment relates to additional benefits for wrongful incarceration, highlighting the state's responsibility to address claims concerning the wrongful conviction of individuals. The bill is specifically geared towards ensuring that individuals who have suffered from such injustices receive financial support from the state as mandated by the court's ruling.

Sentiment

Generally, the sentiment surrounding HB 1160 reflects a supportive view toward addressing injustices like wrongful incarceration. Stakeholders recognize the importance of accountability and recognize the state’s obligation to compensate for judicial errors. The bill has the potential to garner bipartisan support stemming from a shared belief in the necessity of justice for wrongfully imprisoned individuals, though it may face scrutiny regarding budget allocations and fiscal priorities.

Contention

While the bill seems straightforward in its objective, discussions may arise regarding the broader implications of funding legal claims against the state. Concerns may include potential increases in such claims or the adequacy of state funds to cover similar judgments in the future. Critics could argue about the appropriateness of using state resources for individual claims, while proponents may stress the moral and ethical importance of rectifying wrongful incarcerations.