Louisiana House Bill HB591

Louisiana 2011 Regular Session

• Introduced: 4/25/11
• Refer: 4/26/11
• Report Pass: 5/16/11
• Engrossed: 5/25/11
• Refer: 5/26/11
• Report Pass: 5/31/11
• Enrolled: 6/2/11

Caption

Removes termination of the applicability of a certain portion of the tax levied on cigarettes (EN +$12,000,000 GF RV See Note)

Impact

The passage of HB 591 will have a significant impact on state laws regarding tobacco taxation. By removing the termination of the cigarette tax, the state ensures a continuous stream of revenue that can be allocated towards healthcare services. This measure is seen as critical for maintaining and enhancing public health funding, particularly in combating the healthcare costs associated with tobacco use. The revenue generated could support various health care services, thereby improving access and quality for Louisiana residents.

Summary

House Bill 591 aims to amend existing laws regarding the taxation of tobacco products, specifically cigarettes. This bill removes the previously set termination date for an additional tax levied on cigarettes, ensuring its applicability indefinitely. The revenues generated from this tax are intended to be deposited into the state general fund, specifically earmarked for health care services eligible for federal financial participation. This change could potentially increase funding for important health initiatives directly tied to smoking-related health care costs.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment regarding HB 591 ranges from cautious support to apprehension. Proponents of the bill, primarily from health advocacy groups, express approval, highlighting that the sustained funding from the tax will bolster healthcare services. However, some legislators are concerned about the long-term implications of continually taxing tobacco products, particularly for lower-income smokers who may bear a disproportionate burden from such taxes. The debate centers on balancing public health interests with economic fairness for consumers.

Contention

Notable points of contention surrounding HB 591 focus on the implications of raising or maintaining cigarette taxes. Critics argue that increasing taxes on tobacco products could drive consumers to seek lower-priced alternatives or engage in illegal activities to avoid taxes. Additionally, some express concern about the equitable distribution of tax burdens and the potential impact on local economies, particularly among small businesses that sell tobacco products. The legislators must weigh these concerns against the potential public health benefits that sustained funding can provide.