Prohibits any offender sentenced to the legal custody of the Department of Public Safety and Corrections to establish an account on any Internet-based social networking website. (8/15/11)
The introduction of SB182 is expected to strengthen the controls over how incarcerated individuals interact with the outside world through social media. By enforcing this prohibition, lawmakers aim to enhance the safety and security of the correctional environment. Furthermore, this initiative reflects a growing concern over inmates using social media platforms to orchestrate criminal activities or harass victims. The bill aligns with wider trends toward increased regulation of internet use by incarcerated individuals, although it is crucial to balance public safety with inmates' rights.
Senate Bill 182 aims to prohibit incarcerated offenders from establishing or maintaining accounts on any Internet-based social networking website. The bill specifically targets those who are sentenced to the custody of the Department of Public Safety and Corrections, addressing concerns about inmates potentially using social media to communicate with the public or to engage in illicit activities. The bill codifies this prohibition as a new law under R.S. 14:405 and sets penalties for violations, which can include fines or imprisonment.
The sentiment surrounding SB182 appears largely supportive among lawmakers, particularly those advocating for public safety. The unanimous Senate vote (36 in favor, 0 against) suggests a strong consensus on the need for such measures. However, potential points of contention may arise concerning the broader implications of restricting inmates' online presence and its impact on rehabilitation and reintegration into society. Critics may argue that such restrictions could hinder communication and support systems that are vital for inmates' successful reintegration post-release.
While SB182 primarily aims to curtail specific online activities of incarcerated individuals, it raises broader questions about privacy and the rights of offenders. The penalties outlined in the bill, which could involve fines or imprisonment for violations, might be considered harsh by those advocating for more rehabilitative approaches rather than punitive measures. These discussions highlight the ongoing debates over the balance between societal safety and the civil rights of individuals who are navigating the penal system.