Louisiana 2011 Regular Session

Louisiana Senate Bill SB36

Introduced
4/25/11  
Refer
4/25/11  
Report Pass
5/10/11  
Engrossed
5/17/11  
Refer
5/18/11  
Report Pass
6/6/11  
Enrolled
6/16/11  
Chaptered
6/29/11  

Caption

Provides relative to abstracts of title and title opinions. (1/1/12)

Impact

This bill significantly influences state legislation governing property law by establishing the framework for abstracting and title examinations. It formally defines the practices that attorneys must follow when offering title opinions, which underscores the importance of professional standards in the real estate industry. By ensuring that only licensed attorneys can review public records and certify titles, the bill aims to protect consumers from potential disputes over property ownership and title validity. The effective date of January 1, 2012, indicates that these changes were anticipated to begin affecting legal practices and property transactions soon after passage.

Summary

Senate Bill 36, sponsored by Senator Morrish, amends statutes related to the handling and examination of abstracts of title in the state of Louisiana. It provides clear definitions for key terms such as 'abstract of title' and 'title insurance business', which help clarify the roles and responsibilities of legal professionals involved in real estate transactions. The legislation seeks to enhance the reliability of title opinions by ensuring they are conducted by duly licensed attorneys who adhere to set guidelines, thereby promoting consumer confidence in title insurance processes.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB 36 appears largely supportive, especially among legal professionals and those within the title insurance industry. Supporters argue that the amendments will lead to more consistent and professional handling of title examinations, which is critical in maintaining the integrity of property transactions. There may be minimal opposition from non-attorney abstractors or individuals concerned about potential increases in legal costs associated with these required professional services.

Contention

While the bill is largely seen as a positive step toward ensuring proper legal oversight in title insurance, some contention may arise about the potential limitations it places on non-attorney professionals involved in the abstracting process. By restricting title examination to licensed attorneys, there may be concerns regarding accessibility and affordability of services, particularly for first-time homebuyers or individuals seeking cost-effective and efficient title services. The balance between ensuring qualified oversight and maintaining consumer access is a vital discussion point as this legislation is implemented.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB2013

Property taxation: new construction: damaged or destroyed property.

CA AB1500

Property taxation: application of base year value: disaster relief.

CA AB245

Property taxation: application of base year value: disaster relief.

DC B25-0486

Uniform Community Property Disposition at Death Act of 2023

CA SB964

Property tax: tax-defaulted property sales.

CA SB603

Property taxation: transfer of base year value: disaster relief.

CA SB1091

Property taxation: transfer of base year value: disaster relief.

HI HB1398

Relating To Property.