Requests the United State Army Corps of Engineers and the United States Coast Guard to gather information learned during the 2011 Mississippi River floods and update plans for future flooding conditions on the river.
The resolution aims to address the substantial and ongoing impact of the 2011 floods, which overwhelmed the Mississippi River and triggered significant backwater flooding. By urging the Corps to analyze the adverse effects of water diversion on local ecosystems and industries, such as oyster fishing, SCR66 seeks to protect the long-term environmental and economic stability of South Louisiana. This includes understanding the consequences of the river's current management practices and how they can be improved to prevent future disasters.
SCR66 is a Senate Concurrent Resolution that calls upon the United States Army Corps of Engineers and the United States Coast Guard to gather and report findings regarding the implications of the 2011 Mississippi River floods. The resolution emphasizes the need for the Corps to evaluate the flood's effects on the state's fish, wildlife, marshes, and the overall safety of citizens, especially those who had to evacuate due to rising floodwaters. It is a request for the collection of factual data before the upcoming 2012 Regular Session of the Legislature of Louisiana.
Overall, the sentiment surrounding SCR66 is one of proactive concern. Legislators and local stakeholders express a strong need for transparency and preparedness in faced with the threat of similar flooding events. By pushing for a comprehensive report from federal agencies, the resolution reflects a collaborative governmental approach to safeguarding the ecological and social well-being of the region's communities. The sentiment also encompasses a desire to ensure effective recovery plans are in place after such disasters.
While there seems to be general agreement on the necessity of gathering data post-disaster, there may be contention regarding the implementation of the recommendations that emerge from the report. Concerns have been raised about the potential bureaucracy and timeline involved in obtaining federal responses and the adequacy of the proposed actions. Additionally, stakeholders from various industries may have differing opinions on how best to mitigate the environmental degradation resulting from flood management practices, leading to debates on the balance between human activity and ecological preservation.