Louisiana House Bill HB1048

Louisiana 2012 Regular Session

• Introduced: 4/2/12
• Refer: 4/3/12
• Report Pass: 4/23/12
• Engrossed: 5/3/12
• Refer: 5/7/12
• Report Pass: 5/14/12
• Enrolled: 5/30/12
• Chaptered: 6/5/12
• Passed: 6/5/12

Caption

Provides for the maintenance of tax qualification status for the Teachers' Retirement System of La. (EN INCREASE APV)

Impact

The changes proposed in HB 1048 are significant for the Teachers' Retirement System, as they directly affect the eligibility and calculation of retirement benefits. Notably, the bill adopts federal statutes that govern contributions and benefits related to qualified military service. This means that differential wage payments made to teachers who perform military service will now be recognized as earnable compensation, potentially expanding their retirement benefits. The introduction of a Deferred Retirement Option Plan for eligible members aims to provide additional flexibility for those nearing retirement.

Summary

House Bill 1048, introduced by Representative Pope, amends several provisions of the Louisiana Teachers' Retirement System. The bill aims to ensure that the system maintains its tax qualification status by aligning certain provisions with federal regulations. Key amendments include clarifications on what constitutes 'earnable compensation' and provisions for members of the retirement system with military service. By doing so, the bill seeks to protect members' benefits and comply with federal tax laws relevant to retirement systems.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 1048 appears generally positive among legislators, given its unanimous approval in the House with a vote of 94-0. Supporters argue that the bill fortifies the viability of the Teachers' Retirement System by ensuring compliance with federal law, which is crucial not only for the system's integrity but also for the financial well-being of educators considering retirement. The effective date of July 1, 2012, indicates the urgency and importance placed upon implementing these changes to protect the rights of the members.

Contention

While the bill received broad support, there could be underlying concerns about how the amendments might affect funding for the retirement system in the long term. Some members may argue that aligning state provisions too closely with federal legislation, especially with military compensation regulations, could lead to unforeseen financial implications. Nonetheless, the bill's primary contention appears to revolve around ensuring a balance between maintaining the retirement system's integrity and adapting to evolving federal standards.