Louisiana House Bill HB228

Louisiana 2012 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/12/12
• Refer: 3/12/12
• Report Pass: 4/18/12
• Engrossed: 4/30/12
• Refer: 5/1/12
• Report Pass: 5/8/12
• Enrolled: 5/15/12
• Chaptered: 5/22/12
• Passed: 5/22/12

Caption

Authorizes the earning of additional good time by certain habitual offenders for participation in certain rehabilitation and treatment programs (EN DECREASE GF EX See Note)

Impact

The passage of HB 228 is expected to have significant implications for prison administration and the management of inmates. By incentivizing participation in treatment programs, the bill aims to encourage inmates to engage in rehabilitative efforts that could decrease recidivism rates. The bill, therefore, could lead to lower incarceration rates over the long term by promoting behavioral change among offenders. Furthermore, the potential for sentence reduction might alleviate overcrowding within the prison system, which has been a persistent issue in Louisiana.

Summary

House Bill 228 amends Louisiana state laws regarding the earning of 'good time' credits for certain habitual offenders. Specifically, it allows inmates who participate in certified treatment and rehabilitation programs to earn additional good time. This means that eligible offenders can reduce their sentences by completing these programs, which are aimed at facilitating their successful reintegration into society. However, the bill includes exceptions — those convicted of sex offenses or violent crimes are not allowed to benefit from this provision. This legislation reflects an ongoing recognition of the importance of rehabilitation within the criminal justice system, especially for individuals with habitual offender status.

Sentiment

The sentiment around HB 228 appears to be generally supportive among those advocating for criminal justice reform and rehabilitation initiatives. Proponents argue that providing incentives for rehabilitation is a progressive step towards addressing the needs of habitual offenders, enabling them to turn their lives around. However, concerns have been raised regarding the exceptions within the bill, particularly regarding the treatment of offenders convicted of serious crimes. Critics suggest that while rehabilitation is important, there should be a careful consideration of the risks involved in reducing sentences for habitual offenders with violent pasts.

Contention

Points of contention surrounding the bill largely revolve around its exceptions and the potential risks associated with allowing habitual offenders more leniency. Opponents express concerns that the current exclusions for violent and sex offenders may not adequately address the complexities of rehabilitating such individuals, suggesting that further evaluation is needed to ensure public safety. The debate highlights a critical intersection in the criminal justice field — the balance between promoting rehabilitation efforts and protecting community interests.