Louisiana House Bill HB23

Louisiana 2012 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/12/12
• Refer: 3/12/12
• Report Pass: 4/5/12
• Engrossed: 4/17/12
• Refer: 4/18/12
• Report Pass: 4/24/12
• Enrolled: 5/15/12
• Chaptered: 5/22/12
• Passed: 5/22/12

Caption

Authorizes the purchase of an automobile for the Caddo Parish juvenile court (EN +$7,600 LF EX See Note)

Impact

The enactment of HB 23 would specifically affect the administrative functions of the juvenile court in Caddo Parish. By providing the clerk with the authority to acquire a vehicle, the bill aims to streamline processes that may require transport, such as court appearances, outreach programs, and other official duties associated with the juvenile court. This vehicle procurement is expected to enhance overall operational efficiency and effectiveness of the court.

Summary

House Bill 23 aims to authorize the clerk of the Juvenile Court for Caddo Parish to lease or purchase an automobile for office use. This bill is focused on enhancing the operational capabilities of the juvenile court by enabling the purchase of a vehicle that can be utilized for various court-related duties. By permitting the use of funds from the clerk’s salary fund, this legislation ensures that the court has the necessary resources to manage its operations effectively and efficiently.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding HB 23 appears to be positive, with support likely coming from those who recognize the need for improved infrastructure within the juvenile justice system. The bill passed unanimously in the Senate, indicating a broad consensus regarding its importance and necessity in fulfilling the responsibilities of the juvenile court. Stakeholders likely view this measure as a practical solution to meet the court’s logistical needs.

Contention

While the bill appears to have minimal contention given its unanimous passage, concerns could arise regarding the management of funds allocated for the vehicle purchase, specifically how it integrates with existing budgetary constraints. There might also be discussions regarding the long-term financial implications of such purchases within court administrative financing. Nonetheless, as indicated by its passage, no significant opposition was documented during the voting.