Louisiana House Bill HB314

Louisiana 2012 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/12/12
• Refer: 3/12/12
• Report Pass: 4/18/12
• Engrossed: 4/30/12
• Refer: 5/1/12
• Report Pass: 5/9/12
• Enrolled: 5/23/12
• Chaptered: 5/25/12
• Passed: 5/25/12

Caption

Provides for the abolition of certain boards and commissions (EN NO IMPACT SG EX See Note)

Impact

The impact of HB 314 on state laws is significant as it amends multiple statutes related to various governmental bodies. The abolishment of certain boards and commissions could potentially lead to improvements in how state functions are managed and executed, allowing for a clearer focus on core responsibilities of government. This could also involve reallocating budgetary resources that were previously designated to maintain these entities. Supporters argue that the streamlining could lead to a reduction in bureaucratic overhead, enabling quicker responses to state needs.

Summary

House Bill 314 aims at streamlining the organizational structure of state government in Louisiana by abolishing certain boards, commissions, authorities, and similar entities. The bill outlines specific provisions for the repeal of referenced entities, transferring their powers and functions as necessary while promoting a more efficient government structure. By removing redundancies, this legislation is intended to improve the operational efficiency of state government and redirect resources toward essential services.

Sentiment

The general sentiment around HB 314 is largely positive among proponents who advocate for government reform and efficiency. They view the bill as a necessary step towards modernizing the state's administrative framework. However, some concerns have been expressed regarding the potential loss of oversight and expertise that these boards and commissions provided. Critics argue that abolishing these entities could lead to a gap in governance, affecting specific issues that were once prioritized by the now-defunct organizations.

Contention

A notable point of contention regarding HB 314 is the balance between efficiency and representation. While proponents view the streamlining as a way to eliminate unnecessary bureaucracy, opponents worry about the implications for accountability and local governance. The bill's potential to centralize power in state agencies raises questions about local communities' ability to influence state decisions that directly affect them. This debate reflects a broader tension in governance regarding the role of state authority versus local empowerment.