Louisiana House Bill HB319

Louisiana 2012 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/12/12
• Refer: 3/12/12
• Report Pass: 4/16/12
• Engrossed: 4/30/12
• Refer: 5/1/12
• Report Pass: 5/17/12
• Enrolled: 5/23/12
• Chaptered: 6/1/12
• Passed: 6/1/12

Caption

Provides relative to the salary of the assessor in Lafayette Parish (EN +$11,770 LF EX See Note)

Impact

The passage of HB 319 would directly influence the salary structure for the assessor's office in Lafayette Parish by standardizing the pay regardless of population changes. This aims to ensure that the salary remains consistent and is not subjected to fluctuations based on demographic statistics, which may affect budget allocations. Consequently, this could ensure the continuity of experienced personnel in critical assessment roles, fostering efficiency within local governance.

Summary

House Bill 319 was introduced by Representative Montoucet to specifically adjust the salary for the assessor of Lafayette Parish, a position that holds financial responsibility for property assessments within the parish. The bill states that the salary of the Lafayette Parish assessor shall be based on previously established figures, irrespective of the current population statistics of the parish. This adjustment aims to provide stability in the compensation of the assessor's office and recognizes the roles and responsibilities associated with the position.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 319 appeared to be positive during discussions and voting. The unanimous passage in the Senate (with a vote summary showing 37 yeas and 0 nays) indicates a strong bipartisan support for the bill. Legislators seemed to agree on the importance of providing a steady and reliable salary for the assessor, thus enabling effective governance and administration of properties within the parish.

Contention

Despite the overall positive sentiment, there can be concerns regarding how salary adjustments might impact budget decisions within local government. Critics may argue that altering salaries irrespective of population might not be the most prudent use of resources, especially in periods of fiscal constraint. Nonetheless, no substantial opposition was recorded during the final voting process, highlighting a general consensus around bolstering the assessor's office compensation.