Louisiana House Bill HB340

Louisiana 2012 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/12/12
• Refer: 3/12/12

Caption

Prohibits assistance provided under the Family Independence Temporary Assistance Program (FITAP) program from being used for the purchase of goods or services offered in adult-oriented entertainment establishments, gaming establishments, or retail liquor establishments

Impact

The implementation of HB 340 is expected to have significant effects on state laws governing the use of public assistance. Specifically, recipients will be restricted from accessing cash benefits through electronic cards for transactions deemed inappropriate, and penalties will be imposed on retailers who accept these benefits in violation of the law. This change is poised to enhance oversight and potentially reduce fraudulent use of public assistance funds by ensuring that benefits are not spent in venues that are contrary to the aims of the program.

Summary

House Bill 340 prohibits the use of electronic benefits cards provided under the Family Independence Temporary Assistance Program (FITAP) for transactions in adult-oriented entertainment establishments, gaming establishments, and retail liquor establishments. The bill is designed to ensure that cash assistance is used appropriately and in alignment with the goals of promoting family self-sufficiency and personal responsibility among recipients. By restricting the use of these benefits, the legislation aims to maintain the integrity of the state's assistance programs.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding HB 340 appears to be supportive from legislators advocating for fiscal responsibility and ethical usage of public funds. However, there is also concern from certain community advocates about the effectiveness of such restrictions in genuinely aiding families in transition to self-reliance. Critics argue that these restrictions could disproportionately affect low-income individuals, as they may limit access to necessary services or products, thereby leading to a negative impact on their quality of life.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the definition of what constitutes an 'adult-oriented entertainment establishment' as well as the scope of businesses affected by the bill. Opponents argue that the broad nature of these definitions could lead to unintended consequences, affecting legitimate businesses and limiting the options available to individuals using FITAP assistance. Additionally, concerns about administrative burdens on retailers and the feasibility of enforcing these rules are significant discussion points among stakeholders.