Louisiana 2012 Regular Session

Louisiana House Bill HB349

Introduced
3/12/12  
Refer
3/12/12  
Report Pass
4/4/12  
Engrossed
4/16/12  
Refer
4/17/12  
Report Pass
5/16/12  
Enrolled
5/31/12  
Chaptered
6/5/12  

Caption

Amends the Dental Practice Act (EN NO IMPACT LF EX See Note)

Impact

In addition to modifying record-keeping requirements, HB 349 expands the powers of the Louisiana State Board of Dentistry, allowing the board to impose administrative fines and recover associated costs related to investigations and hearings on violations of the act. This addition is intended to streamline the disciplinary process and ensure that all relevant costs incurred by the board, including defense costs in litigations involving board members, can be covered. This could potentially lead to increased scrutiny and regulation of dental practices across the state.

Summary

House Bill 349 amends certain provisions of the Dental Practice Act to clarify the responsibilities of dentists regarding patient record retention and empower the Louisiana State Board of Dentistry with more comprehensive regulatory oversight. The bill requires dentists to maintain and provide copies of dental treatment records in accordance with existing statutory laws. This move aims to enhance compliance and accountability within the dental profession, ensuring that patient records are effectively handled and made accessible when necessary.

Sentiment

The general sentiment towards HB 349 was largely positive, reflecting a broader inclination to strengthen regulatory frameworks in health-related professions. Supporters argued that these changes would lead to better protections for patients and more responsible practices within the dental community. However, some stakeholders expressed concerns regarding the potential for excessive fines or administrative burdens on dental practitioners, highlighting the need for balance in enforcement without hindering service accessibility.

Contention

Noteworthy points of contention surrounding HB 349 included the extent of the board’s authority to impose fines and the clarification regarding legal defenses for employees or agents of the board. Critics worried that the expanded powers might lead to overly aggressive enforcement actions, while supporters maintained that these provisions are necessary to protect public interests and ensure high professional standards in dental care. The discussions illustrated a tension between regulatory enforcement and the operational freedoms of dental practitioners, which is indicative of larger themes within health care regulation.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

NJ AR96

Changes membership of Budget and Labor Committees; clarifies that bill or resolution may be listed on committee agenda for purposes of amendment.

MI HB4870

Campaign finance: contributions and expenditures; funds donated to a candidate for recall efforts; require candidate to establish a separate account used for recall purposes. Amends secs. 3, 11, 12, 21, 24 & 52 of 1976 PA 388 (MCL 169.203 et seq.) & adds sec. 21b.

MI HB4326

Campaign finance: contributions and expenditures; provision related to officeholders raising funds when facing a recall; modify, and require candidate to establish a separate account used for recall purposes. Amends secs. 3, 11, 12, 21, 24 & 52 of 1976 PA 388 (MCL 169.203 et seq.) & adds sec. 21b.

MN HC6

A concurrent resolution recognizing wild rice as sacred and central to the culture and health of Indigenous Peoples in Minnesota and critical to the health and identity of all Minnesota citizens and ecosystems and establishing a commitment to passing legislation to protect wild rice and the freshwater resources upon which it depends.

CA SB602

Advisory bodies.

CA SB1048

Advisory bodies.

CA AB3239

Advisory bodies.

KS HR6003

Providing temporary rules of the House of Representatives for the 2023 session until permanent rules are adopted.