Louisiana House Bill HB372

Louisiana 2012 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/12/12
• Refer: 3/12/12
• Report Pass: 4/4/12
• Engrossed: 4/16/12
• Refer: 4/17/12
• Report Pass: 5/2/12
• Enrolled: 5/9/12
• Chaptered: 5/14/12
• Passed: 5/14/12

Caption

Re-creates the Dept. of State (EN NO IMPACT See Note)

Impact

The legislation plays a crucial role in maintaining the statutory framework governing the Department of State and its entities, effectively preventing any abrupt cease of operations. By establishing a clear timeline for re-creation and termination, the bill seeks to ensure that the department can continue to serve its functions without experiencing disruption. The amendment of existing laws to align with the provisions of this act signifies a commitment to the continued relevance and operational capacity of the Department of State.

Summary

House Bill 372 aims to re-create the Department of State and its associated statutory entities, ensuring their continued operation in Louisiana. The bill specifies that the Department of State and the statutory entities will be re-created effective June 30, 2012, continuing their legislative authority as outlined in the Louisiana Revised Statutes. Additionally, it provides a termination timeline for these entities, extending their existence but setting a prospective end date for July 1, 2015, unless re-created again by the legislature prior to that date.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 372 appears to be supportive, with no recorded opposition during the voting process. The unanimous vote in favor of the bill during its final passage suggests an acknowledgment among the legislators of the necessity of re-creating the Department of State. This bipartisan support is indicative of a broader understanding of the importance of maintaining governmental structures essential for administrative continuity.

Contention

While there was no evident contention during the legislative process for HB 372, the underlying discussion around the bill reflects a larger theme concerning the maintenance and adaptation of state governmental entities. Some concerns may arise in future discussions about the efficiency and mandates of the Department of State, particularly regarding how effectively it serves its purpose post-re-creation. The repeal of certain outdated provisions highlights an ongoing need for legislative updates to address contemporary governance challenges.