Louisiana House Bill HB377

Louisiana 2012 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/12/12
• Refer: 3/12/12
• Report Pass: 4/3/12
• Engrossed: 4/12/12
• Refer: 4/16/12
• Report Pass: 5/28/12
• Enrolled: 6/3/12
• Chaptered: 6/7/12
• Passed: 6/7/12

Caption

Provides relative to credits and overpayments for partnerships filing composite returns (REF NO IMPACT GF RV See Note)

Impact

The impact of HB 377 is significant for partnerships operating in Louisiana, especially those with nonresident partners. By facilitating the process of claiming tax credits through composite returns, the legislation aims to streamline tax compliance for partnerships. It also mandates that these composite returns be filed electronically, which is expected to enhance the efficiency of tax administration and reduce processing times for overpayments determined by the tax secretary.

Summary

House Bill 377, enacted by the Louisiana Legislature, addresses the filing and payment processes related to income tax returns for partnerships using composite returns. The bill specifically allows nonresident members or partners of a partnership to claim their respective share of any credits earned by the partnership for the applicable tax period when a composite return is filed. Moreover, it stipulates that these credits cannot be claimed again on any other returns submitted for the same period, thus maintaining clarity in tax liabilities.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 377 appears to be positive, with broad support noted in legislative discussions reflected in the unanimous vote (94-0) to concur in the Senate amendments. This consensus suggests that the bill is seen as a beneficial reform that simplifies tax filing procedures, ultimately aiding partnerships and their nonresident stakeholders.

Contention

Although the legislation was met with overall support during its passage, notable points of contention typically arise in discussions surrounding the broader implications of electronic filing and the treatment of tax credits. Some stakeholders may express concerns about the efficiency of electronic systems and the potential for technological issues that could complicate compliance. However, these concerns did not significantly hinder the bill's progress through the legislative process.