Louisiana 2012 Regular Session

Louisiana House Bill HB441

Introduced
3/12/12  
Refer
3/12/12  
Report Pass
4/11/12  
Engrossed
4/19/12  
Refer
4/23/12  
Report Pass
5/8/12  
Enrolled
5/15/12  
Chaptered
5/22/12  

Caption

Provides relative to the issuance of abuse prevention orders

Impact

The proposed changes from HB 441 are expected to reinforce victim protections in cases of domestic abuse and stalking. With clearly defined procedures for issuing, modifying, and serving protective orders, the legislation aims to close gaps that previously existed in the law. The registry system for these orders is also bolstered, ensuring that law enforcement is promptly informed and can take necessary actions to protect victims. This bill will likely lead to a more coordinated effort in managing cases involving stalking and domestic violence crimes.

Summary

House Bill 441 focuses on enhancing the state's approach to managing abuse prevention orders, particularly in cases related to domestic abuse and stalking. This bill amends existing protective order laws, allowing courts to issue protective orders that may be effective indefinitely or for a fixed term not exceeding eighteen months. These orders can be modified under certain conditions to ensure greater flexibility for victims and to address evolving situations more effectively.

Sentiment

The sentiment around HB 441 appears to be primarily supportive, as it addresses a critical area in protecting vulnerable individuals from harassment and abuse. Stakeholders, including advocates for victims of domestic abuse, welcomed the updates to the procedures, arguing that it provides necessary tools for both law enforcement and victims. Nevertheless, there may be concerns regarding the implementation of these protective measures and how they are executed in practice, maintaining the balance of due process for the accused.

Contention

While the sentiment is largely positive, there may be points of contention regarding the indefinite duration of some protective orders and the implications of modifying these orders. Critics might argue that indefinite orders could lead to scenarios where defendants are unfairly restrained without adequate review. Moreover, the processes around notifying victims when changes are made to protective orders present logistical challenges that need to be carefully managed to protect victims while ensuring fair legal rights for defendants.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB1081

After School Education and Safety Program: funding: authorized purposes.

CA AB1051

Education finance: state special schools and diagnostic centers.

CA SB1203

School safety: lockdown training.

CA AB2434

County government: allocation of state funds.

CA SB527

Education finance: local control funding formula: home-to-school transportation: cost-of-living adjustment.

CA AB898

Criminal records: automatic conviction record relief.

NJ S1199

Creates new $100 assessment for convictions of certain sexual offenses to fund counseling for victims and their families; establishes Sexual Offender Victim Counseling Fund.

CA AB1391

Education finance: transitional kindergarten: funding for basic aid school districts and necessary small schools.