Appropriates funds for payment of judgment in the matter of "Raymond L. Cannon v. State of La., DOTD"
Impact
If passed, HB 528 will ensure that the state meets its judicial obligations, thereby reinforcing the rule of law within state governance. This action reflects a responsible approach to legal liabilities by allocating necessary funds proactively, which may prevent further legal complications or financial penalties that could arise from failure to comply with court orders. The bill's implementation would represent a prioritization of accountability within state agencies, particularly those involving transportation matters that directly impact the public and state resources.
Summary
House Bill 528 is an appropriation bill aimed at fulfilling a financial obligation from the state of Louisiana regarding a consent judgment in the legal case of 'Raymond L. Cannon v. State of Louisiana, DOTD'. Specifically, the bill allocates a sum of $23,000 from the state's general fund for the fiscal year 2012-2013. This payment is designated to satisfy the judgment awarded by the court concerning the dispute between the plaintiff and the Department of Transportation and Development (DOTD). The bill emphasizes the state's commitment to honoring legal judgments, illustrating the procedural obligations that accompany governmental operations in addressing litigation outcomes.
Sentiment
The sentiment around HB 528 is generally pragmatic, as it does not evoke the same level of debate or controversy seen in more contentious legislative issues. Supporters of the bill focus on the importance of maintaining fiscal responsibility and legal integrity. However, some observers might note that any allocation from the state’s general fund, regardless of the purpose, could spark concerns over budget constraints and competing financial needs within the state's governance.
Contention
While the bill appears straightforward, potential contention may arise regarding the sourcing of funds, particularly in the context of budgetary constraints faced by the state. Opponents could argue for a more critical examination of why these funds are necessary and whether other financial obligations should take precedence. However, overall, the bill reflects a necessary procedural step to ensure that the state honors its commitments stemming from judicial rulings.
Appropriates funds for payment of judgments in the matters of "James Ronald Fowler, Jr. v. State of Louisiana DOTD" and "Crystal Williams v. State of Louisiana DOTD"