Louisiana House Bill HB529

Louisiana 2012 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/12/12
• Refer: 3/12/12
• Report Pass: 5/2/12
• Engrossed: 5/8/12
• Refer: 5/9/12
• Report Pass: 5/30/12
• Enrolled: 6/3/12
• Chaptered: 6/12/12
• Passed: 6/12/12

Caption

Requires an agency to send notice of certain rules to each member of the legislature under certain circumstances

Impact

The impact of this bill is rooted in its potential to change how agencies operate with respect to rulemaking and fee adjustments. Should the fiscal impact of proposed changes reach over one million dollars, the agency must present this information to the Senate and House Appropriations Committees, ensuring a thorough review process. Additionally, for any proposed changes with a fiscal impact of five hundred thousand dollars or more, agencies are obliged to inform all members of the legislature via email on the same day the changes are filed. This creates a new layer of legislative scrutiny over administrative actions.

Summary

House Bill 529 amends Louisiana's administrative procedure laws, specifically R.S. 49:968(B)(24). The bill mandates that state agencies must notify the legislature of any proposed changes to rules or fees that exceed specific fiscal thresholds. This requirement is aimed at enhancing legislative oversight and ensuring that lawmakers are aware of significant administrative decisions that could impact state finances. By establishing clear protocols for notification, the bill seeks to improve transparency in government processes and reinforce accountability in regulatory actions.

Sentiment

The sentiment around HB 529 reflects a supportive attitude towards legislative checks on executive agency actions. Proponents of the bill argue that it empowers lawmakers to stay informed about significant rule or fee changes that could affect state revenues and public policy, thus enhancing the legislative process. On the other hand, opponents may view this requirement as an additional bureaucratic layer that could slow down necessary administrative operations, expressing concerns about the balance between oversight and operational efficiency.

Contention

The primary contention surrounding HB 529 lies in the balance between maintaining efficient agency operations and ensuring adequate legislative oversight. Proponents argue that the bill provides essential checks on agency power, preventing potential overreach in administrative rulemaking. However, critics may argue that this increased level of oversight could lead to delays in implementing necessary rule changes or fee adjustments, thereby hindering the agencies' ability to respond swiftly to changing circumstances.