Louisiana House Bill HB65

Louisiana 2012 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/12/12
• Refer: 3/12/12
• Report Pass: 4/18/12
• Engrossed: 4/30/12
• Refer: 5/1/12
• Report Pass: 5/8/12
• Enrolled: 5/23/12
• Chaptered: 5/31/12
• Passed: 5/31/12

Caption

Increases penalties for the crime of home invasion (EN SEE FISC NOTE GF EX See Note)

Impact

The bill's implementation would amend the existing laws surrounding home invasion, tightening the penalties associated with this crime. Specifically, offenders who commit home invasion while armed will face intensified consequences, like longer incarceration periods. For home invasions involving vulnerable individuals, the penalties will not only be more severe but also mandate that offenders serve a minimum duration without the possibility of parole, probation, or suspension of their sentences. As a result, these modifications may contribute to a heightened sense of security for potentially targeted groups in Louisiana.

Summary

House Bill 65 aims to strengthen Louisiana's legal framework regarding home invasion by introducing increased penalties for offenders, particularly those armed with dangerous weapons. The bill establishes harsher sentences for individuals committing home invasions and elevates the consequences when the victim is under 12 years old, over 65 years of age, or has a developmental disability. The legislation reflects an intent to enhance protection for vulnerable populations within the state and aims to act as a deterrent against such crimes.

Sentiment

The sentiment around HB 65 is generally supportive among lawmakers, particularly from those advocating for stricter criminal justice measures as a means to deter violent crimes. The overwhelming support in the voting process, evidenced by a 97-0 vote in favor during its House vote, demonstrates a consensus on the necessity of addressing home invasions with more stringent penalties. This unified stance suggests a collective understanding of the importance of safeguarding at-risk community members.

Contention

While there appears to be broad support for HB 65, there could be underlying contentions regarding its implications on sentencing practices and potential disparities in enforcement. Critics may argue that increasing penalties alone does not equate to effectively addressing the root causes of crime, and that such measures can disproportionately affect marginalized communities. It is crucial for ongoing discussions to consider not only the necessity of imposing harsher penalties but also the importance of implementing comprehensive preventive measures against home invasion and related crimes.