Louisiana 2012 Regular Session

Louisiana House Bill HB676

Introduced
3/12/12  

Caption

Prohibits the transportation of domestic animals in pickup truck beds and utility trailers on certain roadways unless safely crated

Impact

If enacted, HB 676 would mandate changes to how domestic animals can be transported in Louisiana. It establishes penalties for violations, with a fine of up to $75 for the first offense and up to $150 for subsequent offenses. Additionally, each instance of violation involving multiple animals would count as a separate offense, potentially increasing the fines imposed. While the bill does not apply to agricultural animals, it sets a clear legal standard for the protection of pets during transport on highways.

Summary

House Bill 676 aims to enhance the safety of domestic animals during transportation by prohibiting their transport in the back of pickup trucks and utility trailers on roadways with a posted speed limit of 40 miles per hour or greater. The bill's provisions are directed at common domestic animals, specifically defined as dogs and cats, and include exceptions for situations where these animals are secured in a crate or container. This legislative measure intends to prevent incidents where animals could fall or jump out of vehicles while being transported, thereby increasing their safety on public roads.

Sentiment

The sentiment around HB 676 appears to be generally favorable among animal welfare advocates who support stronger regulations for the transport of domestic animals. Proponents argue that the legislation addresses a critical animal safety issue and protects vulnerable pets during travel. However, there may also be concerns from vehicle owners and those involved in transporting animals regarding the practical implications of the law, especially how it would affect their operations and existing practices.

Contention

While there may be broad support for the aims of HB 676, discussions surrounding its implementation and enforcement could reveal potential points of contention. Critics may argue about the feasibility of compliance, particularly in rural areas or among individuals who regularly transport animals for various purposes. There may also be discussions regarding what constitutes adequate enclosure or security during transport, which could lead to different interpretations of the law.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.