Louisiana House Bill HB696

Louisiana 2012 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/12/12
• Refer: 3/12/12
• Report Pass: 3/19/12
• Engrossed: 3/29/12
• Refer: 4/2/12
• Report Pass: 5/7/12
• Enrolled: 5/22/12
• Chaptered: 6/1/12
• Passed: 6/1/12

Caption

Provides for the testing and licensing of commercial motor vehicle drivers and third parties who give commercial motor vehicle driving tests and examinations

Impact

The bill impacts existing state laws by amending the procedures involving commercial driver's license exams and the oversight of third-party testers. By requiring background checks and ensuring that third-party examiners meet the same qualifications as state examiners, the legislation seeks to centralize accountability and standardize testing practices. This could potentially reduce instances of fraud and enhance the overall safety of the commercial driving environment, as well as increase trust in the testing processes leading to CDL issuance.

Summary

House Bill 696 aims to enhance the process of obtaining commercial driver's licenses (CDLs) in Louisiana by establishing stricter regulations surrounding testing and the licensing of third-party testers. It mandates that all principals of third-party testing entities undergo comprehensive background checks and submit their fingerprint information to ensure they do not have disqualifying criminal records. This change is intended to improve safety standards within the commercial driving sector by ensuring that individuals administering skills tests meet specific qualifications and have undergone proper vetting.

Sentiment

Overall, sentiment surrounding HB 696 appears supportive among legislators who advocate for increased safety and regulation in commercial driving. Proponents argue that the bill is a necessary step to safeguard public safety and ensure that drivers are adequately vetted before obtaining their licenses. However, there may be contention regarding the operational changes required for third-party testing entities, as they will now bear additional responsibilities and costs tied to compliance with the new requirements.

Contention

Notable points of contention may arise concerning the burden placed on third-party testers due to the additional regulatory requirements mandated by the bill. Some stakeholders might argue that these regulations could limit the number of available testing options for prospective drivers, potentially leading to longer wait times for testing and obtaining licenses. Furthermore, the implementation of these background checks may incite discussions about privacy and the implications of heightened scrutiny for individuals seeking to operate commercial vehicles.