Louisiana House Bill HB706

Louisiana 2012 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/12/12
• Refer: 3/12/12
• Report Pass: 4/16/12
• Engrossed: 4/26/12
• Refer: 4/30/12
• Report Pass: 5/14/12
• Enrolled: 5/17/12
• Chaptered: 5/25/12
• Passed: 5/25/12

Caption

Provides relative to the authority granted to the mayor pro tempore and other persons to perform the duties of the mayor in his absence

Impact

The impact of HB 706 on state laws is significant in terms of municipal governance. By formalizing the role of the mayor pro tempore and clarifying their authority, the bill reinforces the continuity of leadership in local governments. This change is expected to streamline meeting processes and decision-making during periods when the mayor is unavailable, thereby promoting stability within municipal operations. Furthermore, it emphasizes the importance of transparency and accountability by ensuring that there is always a designated authority present during council meetings.

Summary

House Bill 706, introduced by Representative Berthelot, amends provisions of the Lawrason Act to outline the roles and responsibilities of the mayor pro tempore in municipalities governed by this act. This legislation allows the mayor pro tempore to preside over meetings in the mayor's absence and provides authority for the mayor pro tempore to perform the mayor's duties during instances of the mayor's physical or mental disability, as certified by a licensed physician. The aim of the bill is to ensure that municipal governance remains effective and uninterrupted when the mayor is unavailable.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment surrounding HB 706 appears to be supportive among municipal leaders and legislators who recognize the necessity for robust governance structures. There is a general consensus that this bill addresses potential gaps in municipal governance and fosters a clearer understanding of leadership roles. However, there could be apprehension from those who might question the extent of authority given to the mayor pro tempore, particularly regarding the powers exercised during the mayor's disability.

Contention

While the bill enjoys broad support, some concerns have been raised regarding the checks and balances associated with the mayor pro tempore's authority. Specifically, opponents may highlight potential abuses of power or decision-making events that could occur devoid of the mayor’s input. The stipulation that decisions made by the mayor pro tempore should only be performed under the specific criteria outlined aims to mitigate these concerns, yet continuous dialogue will be necessary to ensure that municipal governance remains fair and equitable.